
In my opinion, an award-winning performance shows audiences something new, something they haven't seen before. What Heath Ledger gave us in his depiction of The Joker was derivative. Basically, the Ledger Joker was the love child of Jack Nicholson's performance of Jack Torrance in The Shining and Brad Pitt's Jeffery Goines from 12 Monkeys. The hunched shoulders, rambling gait, the gravelly voice: it was all Jack Torrance, all Jack Nicholson. Go ahead and compare the two images; part Heath's hair on the other side and he even looks like Jack in face paint, right down to the receding hairline. Yes, it was a new spin on The Joker, but more than anything, that new spin is thanks to the hair and makeup design that took it from being a campy comic book depiction Tim Burton gave us (and I love Tim Burton's version of the film) to being a seedy, dirty, gritty, realistic character. Can we really give Heath Ledger credit for wearing the makeup and costume well, or interacting with the lights and the city?

So let the hate pour in, but I honestly don't think Heath Ledger was the best actor of 2008.
1 comments:
I'm on that train with you, Ellen. And, what's more, I think Heath Ledger would be too. I wish I could find the exact quote but he said something about Oscars being for people who do the best acting, not the most.
He did a good job in The Dark Knight and I liked the movie and his performance - but I have a natural resistance to giving someone an award simply because he died.
Btw, nice bot message above.
Post a Comment